Welcome
Aedes Divi Iulii: Julius Caesar and His Times
For discussion of the life of Gaius Julius Caesar, 100-44 BC, and Rome in his time.

Aftermath: From Caesar to Augustus (- threads, 63 posts)
    Rome After Caesar (60 posts)
    Historical Thread 1 Featured July 14 , 2006

    For discussions about Caesar's heir ...
    13 Members have made 60 Posts here to date.
    Google
    AncientWorlds.net Web
    Next: Some Scullard thoughts
    Prev: Hmmm...
    Ah, but Aulus...
    Heraklia_teal.gif
    Author: * Heraklia Aelius - 22 Posts on this thread out of 7,303 Posts sitewide.
    Date: Apr 8, 2006 - 11:35

    that's my point. At the time of the assassination, Antony had control, in theory, of the armies, but the main forces in Rome were those ( 1 legion? 2?) led by Lepidus, and everyone agrees it took a couple of days minimum before they were even begun to be utilized.

    And at this point, Octavius was still in Apollonia, blissfully ignorant of what had happened until at least the first-second week in April. He wouldn't really have any serious legionary muscle until the fall of that year and his abortive first march on Rome, when all he really accomplished was to give a speech to the Assembly.

    Don't get me wrong, it's accepted wisdom that the Republic was past saving - and perhaps after decades of mismanagement by the Senate, the people of Rome literally didn't give a damn as to who was supposedly at the head of their government any more.

    But it does strike me that there was an opportunity. I was re-reading Cicero's Phillipics the other night, and while much in them makes me cringe, he DOES seem to be the only voice for returning a Republic, however corrupt and stupid I personally think that Republic had become. But Brutus & Co. simply appear to have lost all their nerve.


    NEXT: Some Scullard thoughts
    PREV: Hmmm...
Rome - Rome, Season 1 - The Stolen Eagle


Copyright 2002-2008 AncientWorlds LLC | Code of Conduct and Terms of Service | Contact Us! | The AncientWorlds Staff