Welcome
Aedes Divi Iulii: Julius Caesar and His Times
For discussion of the life of Gaius Julius Caesar, 100-44 BC, and Rome in his time.

Civil War to Assassination (3 threads, 399 posts)
    Prologue and Entry: The Civil War, 49-45 BC (48 posts)
    Historical Thread

    For discussion of the deteriorating struggle between the Senate and Caesar that led to the Civil War and Caesar's ultimate assumption of absolute power in Rome. ...
    17 Members have made 48 Posts here to date.
    Google
    AncientWorlds.net Web
    Next: Would Pompey have been the better choice?
    Prev: Prancing in to the Discussion
    Parthian campaign
    roman_speaker_sm_blk.gif
    Author: * Moravius Horatius - 4 Posts on this thread out of 265 Posts sitewide.
    Date: Sep 18, 2004 - 06:13

    Salva sis demidiva

    Scripsisti:
    I think it's possible - POSSIBLE - Pompey and Caesar might have held a joint consulship, pushed through some reforms for their respective armies, and retired in glory to be Princeps Senatus, whatever - or Caesar would have gone off happily to conquer Parthia UNDER the control of a Senate he could work with.

    Possible, yes, even after things had begun. Crassus had to be avenged. But would it have been Caesar rather than Pompeius who would conduct the campaign against Parthia? Pompeius would have been the better choice, and the more likely I think. And would that not have caused political tension, no matter which was allowed to remain in Rome to consolidate his position?


    NEXT: Would Pompey have been the better choice?
    PREV: Prancing in to the Discussion
Rome - Rome, Season 1 - The Stolen Eagle


Copyright 2002-2011 AncientWorlds LLC | Code of Conduct and Terms of Service | Contact Us! | The AncientWorlds Staff