The following code, now obviously some of it isn't needed, and Bithiah and Belay both tipped us off to using specific names to control items, all taken from the source code in different areas here in AW. At the beginning of this thread, there are a few posts on this. Anyway, here is what we use in our entrance coding to affect the colors of the links and such, now we only changed a few areas, unlike some other groups like Regia which altered all the links. You may want to peek at their source code to do something similar.

<style type="text/css">
<!--
body {
scrollbar-face-color: b5eaaa;
scrollbar-highlight-color: ffffff;
scrollbar-3dlight-color: ffffff;
scrollbar-darkshadow-color: 000000;
scrollbar-shadow-color: 000000;
scrollbar-arrow-color: 003399;
scrollbar-track-color: b5eaaa;
}

#content {width: "99%"}
.community {
font-family:verdana, arial;
font-size: 85%
}

.community A:hover {
text-decoration:underline;
}

.note {
color:white;
}
.note A:visited {
color: #cccccc;
}
.contentSub {
color:#ffffff;
}
.contentsub A:visited {
color: #cccccc;
}
.note10 {
color:#ffffff;
}
.note10 A:visited {
color: #ffffff;
}
.dynam {
color:#ffffff;
}
.dynam A:visited {
color: #cccccc
}

//-->
</style>

Now, I think that the .community bit is for the side recent 5 posts area. I know that the center main area isn't affected by these link attribute changes, since posting a link there myself they were the usual orange color, and not white. (I've changed them individually instead) and again think that the contentsub bit is to change the member list area titles, as they are also white. I'm assuming then that the usual CSS for setting links attributes doesn't apply in groups unless you set for individual community segments that Jot must have created? As in the .community ones, or .gram etc. I'm SO slow to learn CSS, that it's rather like running through mud for me. All I know is what I've played with and adjusted to see difference in, and some I found no difference at all.