At least that's what the quiz results say. Pst, Corny, the third quiz contains the "emperor" option ... just as a hint. *G*

What Roman position would you be more fitted to? created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as Aediles You are a Curule Aediles or Plebian Aedile. You support Rome from your bank and Rome loves you for it. Youare the man who bring joy and gloomy days and outright happiness on great ones. Aediles 63% Tribune of the Plebs 56% Consul 38% Dictator 31% Praetor 25% Quaestor 19%

---

Which great Roman military genius were you? created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as Gaius Julius Caesar You are Gaius Julius Caesar. You doubled the size of Rome. Destroyed Vercingetorix in the war and beat anything in any situation. You were unstoppable in both the senate and the battle field. You march on Rome for your dignity and did it blood lessely. Yo were dictator for a time but kept it decent and not like Sulla. YOU died assasinated for trying to save the republic. You were CAESAR. Gaius Julius Caesar 58% Lucius Cornelius Sulla 50% Gaius Marius 17%

---

What role would you have in roman society created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as protector of the people the protector of the people had to stop laws being passed that were unfair on the citizenry of rome, the senate had to constantly explain why they wanted to pass laws to you and you could even stop the emperor from passing laws but unfortunately in a clever move the emperors commandeered this position protector of the people 83% Emperor 75% merchant 67% govenor 58% plebian 46% palace guard 46% senator 46% general 42%

---

Which Famous Roman are You? created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as Marius You are Gaius Marius! You like things that work. And if something doesn't work, fix it. Not only that, but fix it so well that no one can improve on it. And while we are at it, nothing should be used that doesn't make sense...tradion, pff who cares... Marius 65% Crassus 45% Sulla 45% Caesar 45% Pompey 40%

Though located in the wrong journal, for I don't regard it as a 'trifle', I'm going to treat myself to a minor rant.

How come that especially the historical aspects of AW are in constant decline? (No, this is NOT going to be yet another rant about festivals.)

There are several members here who offer exceptionally well-researched and cleverly presented homes, properties, articles and other works. And what happens? Their achievements get quickly drowned by other things (site-crash, festival), in most cases even unnoticed. Or maybe not really unnoticed, rather uncommented.

All too often I catch myself after browsing through an article, home or whatever that impressed me, that I've left without leaving well-deserved praise. We all are ready to acknowledge pretty designed pages, cleverly coded somethings or an ingenious new enhancement to a festival. But a cleverly written historical article? A wonderfully re-created ancient site?

Personally, I've noticed that everybody is very forthcoming and open when approached with a question or request - thanks! I've benefited loads from this! However, people also tend to almost jump on others' (potential) errors. Why don't we all show the same enthusiasm when it comes to actually praising someone else's work?

How would you feel if your work is passed over, seemingly unnoticed by anybody?